Digitally managing depression: A fully remote randomised attention-placebo controlled trial


Journal article


Aaron Kandola, Kyra Edwards, Marie AE Muller, Bettina Dührkoop, Bettina Hein, J. Straatman, Joseph Hayes
Digital Health, 2024

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Kandola, A., Edwards, K., Muller, M. A. E., Dührkoop, B., Hein, B., Straatman, J., & Hayes, J. (2024). Digitally managing depression: A fully remote randomised attention-placebo controlled trial. Digital Health.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Kandola, Aaron, Kyra Edwards, Marie AE Muller, Bettina Dührkoop, Bettina Hein, J. Straatman, and Joseph Hayes. “Digitally Managing Depression: A Fully Remote Randomised Attention-Placebo Controlled Trial.” Digital Health (2024).


MLA   Click to copy
Kandola, Aaron, et al. “Digitally Managing Depression: A Fully Remote Randomised Attention-Placebo Controlled Trial.” Digital Health, 2024.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{aaron2024a,
  title = {Digitally managing depression: A fully remote randomised attention-placebo controlled trial},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Digital Health},
  author = {Kandola, Aaron and Edwards, Kyra and Muller, Marie AE and Dührkoop, Bettina and Hein, Bettina and Straatman, J. and Hayes, Joseph}
}

Abstract

Background Depression is a common and disabling condition. Digital apps may augment or facilitate care, particularly in under-served populations. We tested the efficacy of juli, a digital self-management app for depression in a fully remote randomised controlled trial. Methods A pragmatic randomised controlled trial that included participants aged > 18 who self-identified as having depression and scored > 5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive juli for 8 weeks or a limited attention-placebo control app. Our primary outcome was the difference in Patient Health Questionnaire-8 scores at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were remission, minimal clinically important difference, worsening of depression, and health-related quality of life. Analyses were per-protocol (primary), and modified and full intention-to-treat (secondary). The trial was registered at ISRCTN (ISRCTN12329547). Results Between May 2021 and January 2023, we randomised 908 participants. 662 completed the week 2 outcome assessment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 456 completed the week 8 outcome assessments (per-protocol). In the per-protocol analysis, the juli group had a greater reduction in Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score (10.78, standard deviation 6.26) than the control group (11.88, standard deviation 5.73) by week 8 (baseline adjusted β-coefficient −0.94, 95% CI: −1.87 to −0.22, p = 0.045). Achieving remission and a minimal clinically important difference was more likely in the juli group at 8 weeks (adjusted odds ratios 2.22, 95% CI: 1.45–3.39, p < 0.001 and 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08–2.27, p = 0.018, respectively). There were no between-group differences in health-related quality of life or worsening of depression. Modified and full intention-to-treat analyses found similar results, but the primary outcome was non-significant. Conclusion The use of juli for 8 weeks resulted in a small reduction in symptoms of depression compared with an attention-placebo control. The juli app is a digital self-management tool that could increase the accessibility of evidence-based depression treatments.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in